|
Home »
Rebuttal
As a responsible author and in
all fairness to the individuals mentioned on this website, this page contains
commentary received about this
web site.
My fair offer still stands --
The Pronmans (or anyone else) is free to respond and submit "their side" of the
story. As of today, I still have not received any response, feedback or rebuttal
to contradict the factual information contained on this public service website.
9/10/2009 - I
received a
letter from a Canadian attorney which accused me of engaging in a
campaign of defamation and character assassination of Gary Pronman & Dan Pronman.
The letter did not mention what statements on this website were false, if
any.
10/1/2009 - My
lawyer sent a
response asserting that this is a public service website which exercises
my right to freedom of speech. This letter requested that they bring to our
attention any specific inaccuracies so that we may give it the consideration
it warrants.
6/22/1010 - Dan Pronman
posted what appears to be his side of the story on a
different website. While Dan
did not directly provide me his "story" for publication here, I still felt
it my obligation to be as fair as possible and post a copy.
Read Dan's "6/22/10" version of the story.
7/11/2010 - On moparts.org, a
public forum, Dan Pronman offered another version of his story. He also suggested I tell the world about my
criminal history. Well Dan, if it will make you feel like more of a man, here it
goes: "Circa 1990, at
about the age of 22, I was convicted of misdemeanor trespassing." The end.
2/10/2011 - Gary Pronman
appears to have published his latest excuses under the guise of a story. You can
read it here
www.garypronmanvsbrianstyles.info
|
